Courts will disregard the corporate entity, allowing for individual shareholders, directors or officers (i.e. the “alter–egos”) to be held liable in certain circumstances. This is also known as “piercing the corporate veil.”
People also ask, are there grounds for piercing the corporate veil?
‘The corporate veil may be pierced where there is proof of fraud or dishonesty or other improper conduct in the establishment or the use of the company or the conduct of its affairs and in this regard it may be convenient to consider whether the transactions complained of were part of a “device”, “stratagem”, “cloak” …
Moreover, is it hard to pierce the corporate veil?
This legal structure creates an entity separate from the individual. … It is expensive and difficult to pierce the corporate veil and get a judgment against the individual behind the company.
How do you prove your alter ego?
There are two main requirements for alter ego liability. First, the plaintiff must prove that there exists a “unity of interest and ownership” between the owner and the corporation so that separate identities do not actually exist.
What is an example of an alter ego?
An example of an alter ego is a person who behaves almost as similarly to you, your differences are unrecognizable. … The definition of an alter ego is someone with whom you are very close friends. An example of an alter ego is someone with whom you have been friends since childhood.
What happens if you pierce the corporate veil?
If a court pierces a company’s corporate veil, the owners, shareholders, or members of a corporation or LLC can be held personally liable for corporate debts. This means creditors can go after the owners’ home, bank account, investments, and other assets to satisfy the corporate debt.
Can creditors pierce the corporate veil?
In general, creditors have no recourse against corporate shareholders, as long as formalities are satisfied. When, however, the corporation is fraudulently created to escape liability, then creditors may pierce the corporate veil.
Under what circumstances can the corporate veil be lifted?
FRAUD OR IMPROPER CONDUCT– the most common ground when the courts lift the corporate veil is when the members of the company are indulged in fraudulent acts. The intention behind it is to find the real interests of the members. In such cases, the members cannot use Salomon principle to escape from the liability.
Can an individual be an alter ego of a corporation?
Corporations are viewed as separate from their owners under corporate law, so when an owner starts abusing their company for personal accounts, the company has essentially become the owner’s alter ego. This, then, opens owners up to personal liability cases, which can cost owners a tremendous amount of money.
How do I stop my alter ego?
To avoid alter ego problems:
- Assets should be titled in the name of the entity and should only be used for the entity’s purposes;
- There should be no commingling of entity funds with personal funds or the assets of other separate entities;
- A federal tax ID number must be obtained for the entity;
What is the legal meaning of alter ego?
“Alter Ego” is a derived term from Latin. … Alter ego is the doctrine which prevents the stakeholders of the corporation, i.e., shareholders and directors from taking the refuge of doctrine of separate legal entity.
What are 4 circumstances that might persuade a court to pierce the corporate veil?
(1) compete with the corporation, or otherwise usurp (take personal advantage of) a corporate opportunity, (2) have an undisclosed interest that conflicts with the corporation’s interest in a particular transaction, Directors and officers must fully disclose even a potential conflict of interest.
When can the court lift the corporate veil?
Avoiding a legal obligation
The Court may lift the veil if the company concerned is ‘using’ the veil to avoid fulfilling legal obligations. For example, if a company owes a creditor money but transfers their assets to another entity to avoid payment, the Court can lift the veil.
Can breach of contract pierce corporate veil?
Commingling one entity’s assets with another entity’s assets is a signifi-cant factor in favor of veil piercing. … A mere breach of contract was not enough to justify piercing the corporate veil, and Smith’s use of another company’s check did not rise to the level of “commingling” in light of all the evidence presented.
